Are the World’s Metropolis More Alarming Than Smaller Communities? In The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell addresses the phenomenon that is evident in the animal kingdom, as well in our communities today. It has often been speculated that violence seems to rise in densely populated areas. In this book, Malcolm Gladwell points out the observation that has been made to support this hypothesis: when you pack too many species, or people, in one area or small space, there is a rising probability of them becoming aggressive with one another. Violence can really happen anywhere, even in small country areas, but you will more than likely see much more of it where there are many people all living in these small, dense areas.
Is there a way to stop this chain of violence? In many violent situations, people agree that they would do anything in their power to protect themselves and their loved ones from violent individuals. Retaliation in the form of defense is also a huge option for those who feel threatened. Can someone utilize violence in these situations and it make a positive impact? Or does violence - no matter from which side it is coming - perpetuate violence?
Ethical beliefs play a huge role in the way that people deal with violence because they don’t believe that these types of violent retaliations change the world for the better. A company called NXIVM is dedicated to building ethics.
Sara Bronfman had a center recently put in New York City. For obvious purposes, it seems like a great place to test the concept of ethics and violence.
Is there a positive affect from moral fiber diffused in some of the people who live in this populated city location? If you’re unsure of what ethics is, you can equate it to your intuition. They’re the moral rules by which an individual lives his or her life. Not being able to make a decision based on the evidence that you of unsure of what you believe in, shows that many people don’t have the focus on their own morals. If someone’s ethical code is obvious, it is likely that this person will have an idea of how to handle challenging situations as they occur. They are more likely to be consistent and feel a sensation of surety about their decision.
There is a reason that people feel conflicted in regards to violence. People don’t usually think about stealing from someone else and don’t believe it’s appropriate in any way. Many of us are uncomfortable about the idea of killing someone, even in the case of self defense. Can this be a true statement? Is it possible we are not instinctively violent individuals? If we all make better moral decisions, would we see a variation in the way we feel about violent behavior in others? If people have been raised with an objective view of violence, is there a way to teach them something different? I think exploring ethics is a sensible way to determine that for oneself. More thoughts concerning this aspects are shown at
Sara Bronfman programs.